Da Vinci Code Boycott
Tom Hanks spoke out about the boycott of the movie The Da Vinci Code:
But Oscar-winner Hanks said objectors to The Da Vinci Code are taking the film too seriously, telling the Evening Standard: “We always knew there would be a segment of society that would not want this movie to be shown.
“But the story we tell is loaded with all sorts of hooey and fun kind of scavenger-hunt-type nonsense.
“If you are going to take any sort of movie at face value, particularly a huge-budget motion picture like this, you’d be making a very big mistake.
“It’s a damn good story and a lot of fun… all it is is dialogue. That never hurts.”
It’s a fictional story - - not like it’s been hawked around as a factual documentary, or anything. Dan Brown (the author of the book) is no Michael Moore in that regard. But the book, and now the movie, has Chrisitans all up in arms about how it’s ‘attacking the Catholic Church’ and filled with lies and untruths.
Untruths?? How dare they say that about a FICTIONAL piece of work! Pfft.
The call for the boycott is being led by Archbishop Angelo Amato and describeds the book/movie as “stridently anti-Christian” and called for believers to “reject the lies and gratuitous defamation” in the book. He added: “If such lies and errors had been directed at the Koran and Holocaust they would have justly provoked a world uprising. Instead, if they are directed against the church and Christians, they remain unpunished. I hope you will boycott the film.”
A more reasonable Cardinal Cormac Murphy O’Connor, head of the Roman Catholic church in England and Wales, told the Jonathan Dimbleby programme on ITV1 on Sunday: “I think it’s a harmless thriller. If people want to read it they can and people who read it should realise it is fiction.”
That’s more like it.
In a fictional book - I can say that the sun is purple, the moon is made of cheese, the oceans are filled with chocolate and George Clooney kissed me on my doorstep before I turned to walk into my gingerbread house.
Realize it is fiction

































shannon Said:
Completely agree with you here. I don’t see what all the fuss is about a work of fiction. I say bring on the Da Vinci Code movie. I just hope it is as good as the book.
Victoria Said:
Part of the problem comes from the “Disclaimer” which says things like “All descriptions of artwork, architechture, documents, and secret rituals in this novel are accuate,” when they are NOT. These are things the author presents as fact (because of the disclaimer), but they are not fact.
Bascially, the author claims as truth things that are totally made up.